Pierre Poilievre made a lot of statements yesterday, and they were all alarming in their own ways. First up was expressing support for Bill S-210, which aims to require ISPs to ensure age verification for any online porn sites, or face massive penalties—a bill that passed the Senate and is now headed to committee with opposition support in the Commons. It’s a hugely problematic bill that is going to be a privacy nightmare and cause more problems than it solves. Poilievre also said he doesn’t want this implemented by way of a government digital ID or that prevents people from access legal materials, and his MPs keep handwaving and insisting that there must be some kind of technological solution here. There’s not, this is bad, and frankly is pretty Big Government/gatekeeping, which Poilievre claims to hate. What it does, however, is tap into the moral panic over porn being the root cause of a bunch of social ills, and Poilievre loves getting in on that action.
Good luck with that. https://t.co/21YTuoPTAQ
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) February 21, 2024
Since everyone is talking about Bill S-210 and access to explicit materials online, here’s the piece I wrote about it for @CBAnatmag. #cdnpoli #cdnlaw https://t.co/FWit72ZPwV
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) February 21, 2024
He was then asked by Rebel Media about trans people and washrooms—because of course the far-right remains obsessed about this—and Poilievre stated that he was against trans women in changing rooms, washrooms, or women’s sports, which is an outrageous egregious overreach and is Poilievre punching down in order to appease the Rebel Media audience. (I will note that you had pundits on Power & Politics baffled by this, believing that Poilievre has this demographic “locked down.” Not true—he needs to actively court them because they see him as being too soft and establishment—see Christine Anderson referring to him as “Pussyvere”—and he has to constantly prove himself to them). It’s also worth noting that for Poilievre’s press conferences, which are limited to five questions and no follow-ups, Rebel and True North are often at the front of the line for questions, which is another particular sign of who he’s speaking to. Justin Trudeau did respond and push back about this making trans people unsafe, which is true, but this is another moral panic Poilievre is trying to cash in on.
Worth noting that the baiting question Poilievre replied to was posed by David Menzies of The Rebel, who was once arrested while harassing Melissa Lantsman, then an openly gay CPC candidate, now an MP, who said she cut the interview off when Menzies’s questions turned homophobic https://t.co/QmoFZ49TlC
— Bruce Arthur (@bruce_arthur) February 21, 2024
On this
on @CTV_PowerPlay frmr CPC candidate @HannahHodson28 is asked what she thinks the impact will be:
“The impact will be more risk to trans people… There’s still a confusion among the general populace about people like me, who are just trying to live our lives.” https://t.co/hkVVJVYEn6
— Rachel Aiello (@rachaiello) February 21, 2024
Thank you @JustinTrudeau for taking the time to really listen to #trans and the broader #2SLGBTQ community in #Alberta. Truly felt heard, valued and cared for. @R_Boissonnault pic.twitter.com/rNuQMRNy3P
— Marni Panas (@marnipanas) February 22, 2024
The last bit was perhaps the ugliest, where Poilievre was asking about the upcoming online harms bill, and he said that Trudeau shouldn’t be the one to bring it in, claiming this would be censorship, misquoting the line about “those with unacceptable views” (again, playing to the “convoy” audience who took up this misquote with great aplomb), and then launched into a tirade about how Trudeau needs to look into his heart about his past racism and Blackface. And then, because of course, a certain CBC journalist wrote this up (which I’m not going to link to) and devoted half of the story to rehashing the Blackface history including photos, because they didn’t learn a gods damned thing about how Trump got in (and this goes beyond just egregious both-sidesing). None of this is good.
Ukraine Dispatch:
With the loss of Avdiivka, Ukrainians are expecting more advances from Russians. This has spooked enough of the elderly in villages in the area, who are now heading for safer regions, worried that their towns are going to be the next to be ground to dust. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is downplaying the loss of Avdiivka as he calls for more western arms and support, but it has been relentless grind for Ukrainian forces. This said, western intelligence suggests that Russia doesn’t have the domestic capacity to manufacture the ammunition it needs either, so we’ll see how long they can keep up their current pace. Meanwhile, anti-corruption authorities in Ukraine are investigating more than sixty cases involving the defence sector.
https://twitter.com/ukraine_world/status/1760235411987980541
The weapons were intercepted over Poltava, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, and Zaporizhzhia oblasts.
— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) February 22, 2024