We’re still talking NAFTA? Of course, we’re still talking NAFTA, as negotiations actually get underway today, so that’s exciting. If you need any more background (on top of what’s been said for the past several days) here’s a look at why Chrystia Freeland’s list of demands – especially around local procurement and labour mobility – might be a tough sell in the States, while the proposed chapters on gender and Indigenous issues are likely to be seen as simply expressions of the Trudeau government’s values. And while there aren’t any expectations that these negotiations will be easy, given that Trump is an Uncertainty Engine, trade experts are pointing out that Canada has more leverage than we think we do.
Meanwhile, Paul Wells had plenty to say about the past couple of days:
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897422434017697792
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897422919432888320
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897423348501807104
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897425726424702976
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897426057942454272
This particular observation strikes me as so utterly unsurprising. (Seriously, MPs – you can do better):
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897424893817610240
https://twitter.com/InklessPW/status/897428762215809024
And one more, because seriously:
https://twitter.com/kevinmilligan/status/897469441721552897