There were a couple of competing tweet storms that went out yesterday – one from Alex Usher, who seems to think that maybe backbench MPs should consider their jobs to be part-time and take on a second job, and Emmett Macfarlane, who (correctly) thinks that idea is a bunch of bunkum.
2/ Some folks suggest we should increase MPs pay to attract better ppl into politics. Wont happen (and probably shouldn't)
— Alex Usher (@AlexUsherHESA) March 20, 2017
4/ George Osborne is a massive knob & objectionable human being but I've no problem w/him running a newspaper concurrently with being an MP.
— Alex Usher (@AlexUsherHESA) March 20, 2017
6/ Constituents might no doubt object, but then let them vote these candidates in/out.
— Alex Usher (@AlexUsherHESA) March 20, 2017
8/ So why not in what is supposed to be in real deliberative chamber? (Oh, and ban PMO talking points). fin.
— Alex Usher (@AlexUsherHESA) March 20, 2017
https://twitter.com/EmmMacfarlane/status/843847448137252864
https://twitter.com/EmmMacfarlane/status/843847937264357376
https://twitter.com/EmmMacfarlane/status/843848254743891969
As Kady O’Malley points out, it’s not actually against the rules.
FWIW (and not to interrupt your flow), but backbench MPs *can* have outside employment, provided there's no conflict…
— kady o'malley (@kady) March 20, 2017
And hey, there’s even an academic study that shows that the public (at least in the UK) isn’t too keen on backbenchers taking on second jobs.
tl; dr: public not keen.
— Philip Cowley (@philipjcowley) March 17, 2017
I’m going to assume that much of Usher’s position comes from ignorance, because let’s face it – most people, including most MPs, don’t know what an MP’s job description is supposed to be. (Hint: It’s holding the government to account). But because most MPs don’t know that’s their main job, many of them spend their days burning their time and energy doing things like writing up and promoting a dozen private members’ bills that will never see the light of day, or crusading for causes that are as much about getting their own face in the news than they are about helping those in need (or maybe I’m just cynical). The point, however, is that if Usher thinks MPs are bored and in need of something to do, I would suggest that those MPs should actually be doing their jobs, and if they’re actually doing it right, then they shouldn’t be bored. They especially shouldn’t be bored if they’re doing their jobs correctly and not just reading scripts into the record prepared by the leader’s office (and to be fair, there are a few MPs who don’t, even though they’ll still rely on prepared speeches). If we carry on with this path of making MPs obsolete by turning them into drones then sure, I can see Usher’s point, but the answer is not to let them take on outside work. The answer is for them to actually learn their own jobs and do them. Parliament would be vastly improved if that were actually the case.