Another day, and other leak that claimed that Trump wasn’t really serious about the tariffs, but that this was just him trying to get an early start on New NAFTA re-negotiations rather than waiting for 2026, and trying to bring more auto manufacturing back to the US-side of the border. But when asked about this during his media availability, Trump insisted that no, he was very serious about the “millions” of people who had come illegally through Canada (it’s certainly not in the millions), and the scourge of fentanyl. He even went on this extended tirade about how mothers never recover when they lose their sons to drugs, and so on. But then he also issued a pardon to Ross Ulbricht, a crypto drug dealer. So yeah, he’s really concerned about the scourge.
https://t.co/HZADvw8AcO pic.twitter.com/Pkr0YJYlFC
— Alheli Picazo (@a_picazo) January 22, 2025
Meanwhile, Danielle Smith spent the day in full-on appeasement mode, insisting that we need to find a diplomatic solution rather than stand up to Trump’s bullying. Oh, and she also tried to blame this situation on Trudeau, because of course she did. What I find particularly irksome, however, are the whitebread pundits who also try to keep blaming Trudeau for Smith not falling into line, because he should somehow debase himself in order to get her on-side when it’s clear that she has no interest (and absolutely no incentive) to do so. Her political brand and that of her party right now is about hating Trudeau. Nothing he can or will do will get her on-side, particularly when her ideology is more in line with Trump’s than it is to stand up for Canada.
I’m all for diplomacy, but we all know what happens if you don’t stand up to bullies. Your negotiating position is weakened, not strengthened.
But maybe this person is just angling for a side-deal with Trump?
Yes, advocate for cooperation. No, don’t surrender in advance. https://t.co/McxYcM2VAx
— Roland Paris (@rolandparis) January 22, 2025
Is it, though?
The prime minister is not the premiers’ father. They have separate spheres of authority. The notion that he is obligated to debase himself because one premier has created an identity predicated on hating him is absurd. https://t.co/fj8OYQf8Mv— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) January 21, 2025
Back home, Pierre Poilievre is demanding Parliament be summoned because we’re in an “emergency,” erm, except there is nothing for Parliament to do. Cabinet has all of the powers they need in the current situation, and they continue to function. The only reason for the House of Commons to sit would be to have a take-note debate to read prepared speeches that would be used for clips. But more likely, Poilievre wants to try and force an election right now, because that suits his political interests rather than the country’s as a whole (because once there is dissolution, government goes into caretaker mode and really can’t respond to Trump). In fact, Trudeau has a lot more latitude right now because he’s on his way out and doesn’t need to worry about re-election. We’re not leaderless, there is no “vacuum,” and it would be great if the media stopped repeating this nonsense, just because Cabinet hasn’t been lighting their hair on fire on a daily basis.
Retaliatory tariffs do not require legislation. There is no actual need to recall Parliament. pic.twitter.com/pE8DcDM5FG
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) January 21, 2025
Ukraine Dispatch
"We are not permitted to choose the frame of our destiny. But what we put into it is ours."
Dag HammarskjoldThe combat losses of the enemy from February 24, 2022 to January 22, 2025. pic.twitter.com/T5Jn5MSxbX
— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) January 22, 2025
Zelensky says he wants to end war "quickly but fairly and reliably" in 2025.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Jan. 21 reiterated his commitment to ending Russia's war in 2025 "not just quickly but fairly and reliably." "We want to end the war this year – not just…
— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) January 21, 2025