Today is the Conservatives’ first caucus meeting of the new parliament – in person, no less – and everyone is anxiously awaiting news of whether they plan to vote on the (garbage) Reform Act provisions that would give caucus the ability to call for a leadership review. While I wrote about this for my column, coming out later today, I will make a few additional notes here.
As the column spells out, these provisions don’t actually provide an accountability mechanism, and they will wind up protecting O’Toole more than they will threaten him. So when I see MPs like Tom Kmiec saying that he wants MPs to accept the (garbage) Reform Act powers on a leadership review, citing that it provides a clear process, what he omits is that the 20 percent threshold insulates O’Toole, because those 24 MPs would need to openly sign their names to a letter to the caucus chair, meaning they will be easily identifiable for retribution if O’Toole survives the subsequent vote and/or leadership review, and that retribution can include not signing their nomination papers. That’s not an insignificant threat against them.
Meanwhile, Senator Michael MacDonald, a former Harper-era organizer, is urging a vote on a leadership review, citing O’Toole’s decision to say anything to whoever was in the room as being a threat to the party’s future chances.
The Senator needs to convince MPs to hold such a vote because under the (garbage) Reform Act, senators do not count as members of caucus for purposes of such a vote, which was egregious when the bill was debated, and remains egregious today. https://t.co/oRXQrcJjpL
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) October 5, 2021
He writes “the 2017 leadership Erin ran as a sort of red Tory…But in 2020 Erin ran as a “true blue” Conservative…once he was elected Leader he did a second 180 degree turn…his belief that the only way for the Conservatives to win was to abandon certain Conservative policies3/7
— Evan Solomon (@EvanLSolomon) October 5, 2021
“… Our fiscally responsible policy got sold out in the name of potential political gains, yet having sold out our principles, we lost just under 3% of our popular vote and 2 seats (net )” 5/7
— Evan Solomon (@EvanLSolomon) October 5, 2021
“He ran in 2017 leadership as a bit of a red Tory, then in the 2010 leadership as “true blue” then as Leader he turned the party back to the left…what is he – a red Tory centrist, a blue Conservative, or just someone who tacks with the wind and goes where the winds carry him”
— Evan Solomon (@EvanLSolomon) October 5, 2021