Roundup: No backbench rebellion…for now

Posted on by

As far as backbench revolts go, this one was a bit of a damp squib, or to put it another way, Wells’ First Rule has once again borne out in practice—For any given situation, Canadian politics will tend toward the least exciting possible outcome. Purportedly, Trudeau addressed caucus and got emotional talking about the toll has taken on him, including his children constantly seeing the “Fuck Trudeau” flags and so on, but nevertheless there was a frank airing of grievances from some MPs, though nobody had a copy of that memorandum calling on him to step down that had names attached (oh, the bravery!). In the end, it looks like it was only 24 backbench MPs who had signed onto this (not that anyone could see the names), which is not 40, and makes it easier for them to be dismissed (though still, that number could very well grow). Nevertheless, there was a commitment for everyone to reflect more about what was said, and a few voices have said that they want Trudeau to give some indication by Monday if he plans to stick around or to call it a day (though I can’t imagine that he would want to make any such decision on their timetable).

While the message coming out of caucus was that they have never been stronger or more united, that sounds an awful lot like the “We’ve never been more united” speech just before or after someone crosses the floor. Others, like Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, said that the palace intrigue needs to stop and that the knives need to turn outward rather than inward—a reference that the real enemy is Pierre Poilievre, and not Trudeau, though again, nobody is saying that this matter is done with, particularly given that everyone needs to reflect on what happened.

This having been said, I think it’s fair to question the organizational abilities of those leading this backbench revolt, because a lot of what has come out in public has been pretty shambolic, as is the fact that there seems to be absolutely no plan for the day after if Trudeau did take their message and decide to start planning his exit. I think in part that’s because there has been no heir apparent, or nobody for anyone to rally around as a focal point for who could replace Trudeau, and that may have as much to do with the fact that a good many MPs were political operatives or even staffers who were around during the Chrétien-Martin wars, and remain traumatized by them, and the fact that Trudeau had very consciously focused on rooting out those camps when he took over the party. We’ll see what happens over the next week or two, but just because nothing happened today doesn’t mean that the tide isn’t shifting.

Ukraine Dispatch

Russians have captured two villages in the Donetsk region in the east, and are currently storming four more settlements in the Donbas region, but those attacks are currently being repelled. The Americans have now corroborated that as many as 3000 North Korean troops are now in Russia, training for a possible deployment to Ukraine. Here is a look at how fire trucks in Nikopol now have anti-drone jammers mounted on them because Russians have been targeting them.

Good reads:

  • Sean Fraser declared that he may give anti-homelessness money directly to municipalities in three provinces after a lack of provincial response.
  • The government is set to announce reduced permanent residency targets by about 20 percent (but it’s still higher than when they took office in 2015).
  • Montreal mayor Valérie Plante says she won’t run for a third term.
  • Danielle Smith announced a review of rules for professional regulators to ensure they’re not policing speech, essentially a sop to the Jordan Peterson crowd.
  • Kevin Carmichael parses the Bank of Canada’s deliberations in making the half-point interest rate cut.
  • Marc Garneau writes about what more Canada needs to do to regain international credibility, and it means re-investing in the foreign service as well as the military.

Odds and ends:

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.

One thought on “Roundup: No backbench rebellion…for now”

  1. It looks like at least some of the people who signed the letter are MPs in areas where the Liberals hadn’t had seats for awhile, BC, Maritimes….maybe they should have been spending more time making themselves the kind of MP that could hold onto a seat in tough times. Maybe it’s easier for a constituent to talk about Trudeau than to say, “Where have you been?” to someone’s face.

    Ah, it’s a tough job. But it’s heart-rending to see Liberals making the same mistake.

Comments are closed.