Roundup: Putting words in the Auditor General’s mouth

It was an Auditor General’s Report Day in the Nation’s Capital, and these reports were far more salacious than many in the past, which is in part why they dominated Question Period. The AG looked at three issues—contracts awarded to McKinsey and Company, the allegations around governance at Sustainable Development Technology Canada, and combatting cybercrime, and each report has a lot of things to say.

  1. Many of the contracts awarded to McKinsey were done sole-source with poor justification, going all the way back to 2011. And for context, these are contracts sought and awarded by the civil service, and not the political direction of the government; also, while there was a huge focus on McKinsey, they are less than one percent of these kinds of external contracts.
  2. There were governance problems at SDTC, including conflicts of interest in awarding funds, but there has been a lot of reporting in The Logic that suggests that some of this has been overblown, such as the fact that everyone on SDTC’s roster was given funds during the pandemic including operations that directors had ties to, so there couldn’t have been preferential treatment. Nevertheless, the government announced today that they are essentially pulling the plug on the organisation and folding it into the National Research Council.
  3. Cybercrime incidents have a poor record of being followed up on when reported to the wrong agency, and that many were dropped and the complainants were not told they reported to the wrong agency, meaning that a lot of files got lost along the way. The government is working on a single-window solution for reporting cyber-incidents, but that hasn’t happened yet.

On the first two, the Conservatives made up a huge fiction about these being contracts to “Liberal insiders,” or “friends of the government,” or “cronies,” or the like, when the reports said absolutely nothing of the sort. In fact, the reports quite clearly state that there was no political direction or involvement in these contracts, which means that these allegations by the Conservatives are not only false, but potentially libellous, but they want to create an air of corruption around the government. In addition, they seem desperate to avoid any scent of involvement themselves, when the McKinsey contract problems date back to when Harper was in government, and SDTC was set up by the Conservatives, including its governance structure, which proved problematic. In either case, the cries of corruption and trying to invoke the ghost of Sponsorship are little more than cheap lies, but that’s what the Conservatives do best these days, it seems, so none of it is surprising.

Ukraine Dispatch:

A pair of Russian missiles struck civilian infrastructure in Dnipro, injuring eight including two children. Ukrainian officials say that the decision to allow Ukraine to strike into Russian territory will disrupt their advances and help defend the Kharkiv region.

Good reads:

  • Chrystia Freeland says the NSICOP report on some parliamentarians aiding foreign governments to be “concerning,” but the government won’t name names.
  • The federal and BC privacy commissioners are launching a joint investigation of a company in Victoria that does background checks for landlords.
  • The CRTC is moving ahead with requiring streaming services to contribute 5 percent of their Canadian revenues to content creation funds.
  • The Grassy Narrows First Nation is suing the Ontario and federal governments for the ongoing mercury contamination since the 1960s.
  • The NDP’s Supply Day motion calls for a price cap on grocery staples if stores and suppliers don’t lower prices. (Because “Zap, you’re frozen!” was bound to return).
  • NDP MP Laurel Collins is hoping to fast-track her private member’s bill on criminalising coercive control.
  • The Alberta government is interfering with its “independent” energy regulator, and dismantling its arm’s-length health authority.

Odds and ends:

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.