Roundup: A stunt at committee everyone fell for

Posted on by

The Conservatives, and Michael Chong in particular, pulled a stunt yesterday where they tried to call for an emergency meeting at the Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics committee to study the Winnipeg Lab documents. Liberal and NDP members on the committee said that this isn’t the right committee and this isn’t an emergency, and shut it down. This was the Conservatives’ plan, so that they could take to social media and scream and caterwaul about the “cover-up coalition,” and just like they planned, virtually every single pundit and media outlet did their bidding for them.

To wit, this is that particular committee’s mandate:

“Under Standing Order 108(3)(h), the Committee’s mandate is to study matters related to reports of the Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada, and the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner pursuant to the Conflict of Interest Act (matters related to the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons are studied by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs). The Committee can also study any legislation or regulation or propose initiatives that relate to access to information and privacy and to ethical standards relating to public office holders.”

This study has absolutely nothing to do with it, and while there should be some kind of parliamentary scrutiny, it belongs most likely at the Health Committee, as PHAC would fall within their remit, and possibly Public Safety and National Security, but not Ethics. The NDP think this should go to the Canada-China Relations committee, but I also find that one to be a bit of a stretch (because I also think that committee is little more than a sideshow). But again, it was wholly appropriate for the Ethics committee to shut this down, because it was only meant to be a stunt.

It’s absolutely maddening to see how many media outlets and pundits walked right into this trap and let themselves get played. The CBC, for example, both-sided it, with the headline of “Conservatives accuse,” and the Liberals pointing out this was the wrong committee halfway down the piece. The Canadian Press both-sidesed it more concisely, and didn’t provide any context about the committee. The Globe and Mail, somewhat predictably, downplayed the Liberals and NDP pointing out that this was the wrong committee, gave over plenty of space to the Conservative argument that it should be without actually checking it against the statutory remit of the committee, and privileged Michael Chong’s comments, when he is not on the committee and was 100 percent pulling a stunt.

The thing is that this keeps happening—Conservatives have been regularly proposing studies on issues that committees have no remit over (such as trying to get the Public Accounts committee to go after the Trudeau Foundation), and then crying foul when they don’t play along, and then drive social media engagement off of the faked outrage. Rules matter. Parliamentary procedure matters. It’s not a “process story” you can dismiss, it’s bad faith actors playing the media, and the media going along with it when they should know better.

Ukraine Dispatch:

Ukrainian forces say they stopped a Russian advance near Avdiivka, but that Russian troops appear to be regrouping further south.

Good reads:

  • Chrystia Freeland has set the budget date for April 16th.
  • Sean Fraser says that the federal government has reached 179 agreements under the Housing Accelerator Fund.
  • Marc Miller is moving ahead with family reunification immigration applications in Quebec over the objections of the province, who were dragging their feet on them.
  • Bill Blair announced $45.3 million for energy retrofits at the Canadian Forces base in Edmonton.
  • Steven Guilbeault says that Saskatchewan not remitting their carbon levy is “immoral” and “irresponsible,” and that measures must be taken.
  • Ministers like François-Philippe Champagne and Mary Ng are lining up “strategic allies” in the US to prepare for a potential Trump comeback, and the tariffs it means.
  • The foreign interference inquiry will hear some federal evidence behind closed doors, and provide public summaries where possible.
  • Conservative Jamil Jivani won the Durham by-election by over 50 percent, and says it “sends a message.” (The Conservatives have held that riding for two decades).
  • Alberta is promising a $125 million over five years plan for drought and flood mitigation in the province (but they won’t attribute it to climate change).

Odds and Ends:

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.

One thought on “Roundup: A stunt at committee everyone fell for”

Comments are closed.