Roundup: The Convoy Party of Canada

Posted on by

The CBC did the work of comparing the names on the leaked GiveSendGo data around donations to the occupation of Ottawa from back in February and compared it to the publicly available donor database from the Conservative leadership campaign, and lo, there was a lot of overlap, to the tune of $460,000 from 3,100 donors to both (a likely underestimate as they ignored close names and postal codes), and most of that went to Pierre Poilievre’s campaign. A lot of these names had never donated federally before, which shows that the occupation has galvanised a political movement. Now, this was only 4.2 percent of the donors to the leadership overall, but this gives you a sense of why Poilievre has decided to give up on the political centre and focus his hopes on these fringe elements who had previously been disaffected, hoping that they will be what is able to push him over the edge in the next election.

https://twitter.com/StephanieCarvin/status/1570804839663415296

https://twitter.com/StephanieCarvin/status/1570805416250187776

This was something that I discussed with Stephanie Carvin in a previous video we did, and wrote a column about—this kind of political movement is catnip to parties, and they will try and ride this tiger in order to benefit from it, either in votes or donations. But that’s the thing about riding the tiger, is that almost all of the time, you can’t actually do it, and it will turn around eat you, and that’s exactly what Poilievre has risked his entire political party to do. And rest assured, a fringe group who are not rational actors will be very hard to control, and they risk easily turning on him when they find out that he can’t do most of the things he promised them he would, or that his economic theories are based on utter nonsense, and that his entire platform is built on a foundation of sand. We watched this happen when the Republicans in the US embraced the Tea Party, and it drove them further to extremism and to Donald Trump. Justin Ling details that, and other examples, in this op-ed, and the fact that Poilievre and his camp believe they’re cleverer than all of those other parties who tried to embrace the fringe and were consumed by it. That’s probably the most chilling part, because Poilievre is certainly not cleverer, and he has a higher opinion of himself and his abilities than anyone who has watched him for any length of period would see. Jason Kenney also suffers from the same affliction, and look where it got him. We are entering into dangerous territory.

Ukraine Dispatch, Day 205:

Attention in the conflict remains on the discovery of the mass graves in Izium, where more have been discovered, and many with hands tied behind their backs and showing signs of mistreatment before they were killed. Meanwhile, it has been decided that president Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s wife, Olena Zelenska, will travel to London for the Queen’s funeral.

Good reads:

  • In advance of the Queen’s funeral, Justin Trudeau will have his first audience with Charles III as King of Canada.
  • Poilievre’s shake-up of the party’s backrooms continue, as he brings in the Ontario PC Party’s executive director to run the federal party.
  • Senator Jean-Guy Dagenais, who left the Conservative caucus under Scheer, has now torn up his party membership now that Poilievre is in charge.
  • Althia Raj’s sources say the government is considering lifting all pandemic border restrictions, including vaccines and possibly ArriveCan (though I doubt that one).
  • My Xtra column looks at why Poilievre is going to be a difficult leader for progressives to counter, because he resists the usual narratives.
  • My weekend column on Alain Rayes’ departure from caucus ostensibly because he finds Poilievre too toxic, but hasn’t accounted for the toxicity of Scheer and O’Toole.

Odds and ends:

Here’s a look at what the Queen did for advancing feminism and normalising women in positions of authority.

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.