Roundup: Questions on the inquiry terms

It is now on or about day sixty-two of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and there were missile strikes throughout the country as Russian forces targeted Ukraine’s rail infrastructure, with a particular eye toward disrupting the ability to move weapons coming in from allied countries in the west toward their positions in the eastern part of the country. (This is the kind of operational security that is at stake when our government won’t give specifics about their weapons shipments). As well, the American officials who just visited Kyiv have said that more weapons are on the way, and that they are hoping to resume activity in their embassies within the country within the next few weeks, and hopefully in Kyiv itself, which would be a major symbolic move (and yes, Canada is making its own considerations for resuming activities, depending on the security situation).

Closer to home, the government waited until the very last moment to launch the public inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act, as the Act stipulates. Justice Paul Rouleau of the Ontario Court of Appeal will head the inquiry, and has 300 days to table his final report in Parliament. While I have a column that delves further into this, I did want to put a few comments here, from national security experts Jessica Davis and Leah West, about particular observations they have about the terms of reference for this inquiry:

Good reads:

  • A major report was released yesterday calling out the military for ignoring its problem with systemic racism and white supremacy for the past twenty years.
  • The government is planning to spend $1 billion on new northern radar systems as part of NORAD modernisation.
  • Carolyn Bennett admits it’s taking a long time to get a national three-digit suicide prevention hotline in place because it’s a complicated endeavour.
  • A BC First Nation has reached a $135-million settlement with the government 160 years after settlers began taking over its lands.
  • At the Commons finance committee, Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem threw some shade at Pierre Poilievre’s farcical notion about abandoning fiat currency.
  • The head of global vaccine distribution group Gavi told the Commons foreign affairs committee that variants will keep emerging unless there is better global vaccination.
  • AFN national chief RoseAnne Archibald is asking the UN to investigate Canada’s possible human rights violations related to residential schools.
  • B’nai Brith says that there was a record rise in antisemitism in Canada last year.
  • Chatelaine has an interesting interview with Michelle Rempel Garner.
  • With news of a new “protest convoy” heading to Ottawa, this time on motorbikes, police have banned vehicles from certain areas of the city. (But will they enforce it?)
  • Kevin Carmichael reflects on the Bank of Canada’s attempt to find a soft landing for inflation without destroying too much demand or jobs along the way.
  • Carmichael also parses Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem’s comments at the Commons finance committee on the path of rate hikes.
  • Susan Delacourt posits that the inquiry into the Emergencies Act may wind up being a look into the health of our democratic institutions and their vulnerabilities.

Odds and ends:

My Loonie Politics Quick Take on the faux “truck tax” and the likelihood it becomes fodder in Question Period this week.

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.

2 thoughts on “Roundup: Questions on the inquiry terms

Comments are closed.