As the secret trials of the two Michaels concluded in China without verdicts, Canada made more moves against China in concert with other international allies. Part of that was Canada warning other countries who do business with China about the risk of arbitrary detention and hostage diplomacy, and we had the support of 28 diplomats from 26 countries at the court houses in China where those trials took place, demonstrating that Canada is not alone in this, and we are also leading over 50 other countries in the declaration against arbitrary detention. In addition, we levied sanctions against four Chinese officials in relation to the human rights abuses taking place against the Uyghurs, in concert with the US, the UK, and the European Union.

This is the point where you get some voices cry out why we haven’t used the “genocide” label yet, as though that doesn’t come without consequences under international law, and if they think that Canada is able to go it alone in trying to prevent it and hold the perpetrators to account, well, they are smoking something particularly potent. What is important to remember about the actions that happened yesterday is that they were done in concert with our allies, which is extremely important because it means that China will be less able to isolate us and try to impose economic retaliation. Most of the time, the Americans are able to say and do anything because they have enough economic heft to withstand the retaliation, but Canada can’t go it alone, and many of the voices in this country, who are deeply unserious about foreign policy, can’t seem to grasp that, preferring instead to thump their chest or virtue signal. Canada needs to deal with China in a multilateral capacity, and that takes time, and the consensus needs to be built behind closed doors so that China can’t try to pick apart participants before agreements are reached. But nobody likes nuance or patience, so we get the caterwauling that we do (especially from media voices, who appear to be even less serious about this, if that is even possible).

Good reads:

• Justin Trudeau made another appearance with François Legault yesterday, this time to promise more federal dollars for high-speed internet in Quebec.
• Trudeau also gave a blatant pander to Quebec voters in calling out an obnoxious blowhard professor for calling the Quebec government “white supremacists.”
• It looks like the CRA has been turning over data from hundreds of thousands of bank accounts to the IRS, even though they were below FATCA reporting requirements.
• The Defence Committee heard from Stephen Harper’s former chief of staff about General Vance, and how they couldn’t find evidence to support allegations made.
• There are some Senate staffers who fear the new harassment policy will be debated until it dies on the Order Paper. (I know others who say the new policy is bad news).
• Doing the post-convention media rounds, Erin O’Toole insisted he’ll still have a climate plan “before the election” (with some of the usual hedges in said promise).
• A former Conservative candidate went to court in order to be able to run for a post on the party’s National Council after she was disqualified for Islamophobic posts.
• Colby Cosh delves into the debate over whether or not “sex addiction” is a real thing.

Odds and ends:

My latest Loonie Politics video calls out the Liberals for weaselling out on their promise to restore borrowing authority to Parliament, and it’s caught up to them.

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.