For the past week, in the wake of Julie Payette’s resignation, we have seen the various cheap outrage stories and QP attacks circling around. How dare she get her generous pension if she voluntarily resigned under a cloud of scandal? Why should Canadians have to pay for this? (Usually followed by the usual republican nonsense that falsely equates how much Canada’s contribution to the monarchy is and which grossly underestimates how much more an elected head of state would cost compared to the system we have in place now).
While Parliament could theoretically alter the laws that guarantee Payette her pension, trying to do so retroactively would invite a lawsuit that the government would be hard-pressed to win. Not to mention, the fact that she walked away without causing a constitutional crisis is probably worth the pension (because seriously, that could have been very ugly and messy). As for the additional annuity that former GGs are afforded to support any duties related to their time as GG that carry on afterward, be it speeches or answering letters, I’m less fussed about that because I think it’s healthy that we have people who are interested in keeping up civic duties once their term is over (especially as we don’t have ready-enough access to members of the royal family for that kind of thing), but would welcome additional transparency and reporting around that. It does, however, help make the somewhat ageist case that we shouldn’t appoint GGs that are too young because what do they then follow it up with after holding the second highest office in the country? (See: Michaëlle Jean’s time as head of the Francophonie). We also have to remember that things like a GG’s pension are made generous enough because it’s part of institutional independence – we don’t want a prime minister to threaten that pension if they aren’t going to get their way. It’s actually the same logic behind why you want a monarchy to be rich – so that they have independent wealth and that can’t be used as leverage by a government. Of course, Canadians have been conditioned to revel in hairshirt parsimony after the Reform Party years and media that delights in the response they get from cheap outrage stories, so we’re going to keep getting them, no matter how inappropriate and damaging to our institutions that they actually are.
Meanwhile, Erin O’Toole has been making the rounds claiming that Justin Trudeau would be in a “conflict of interest” if he chose the next GG on his own, and I just cannot with this completely illiterate nonsense. There would be no conflict because the GG acts on the advice of the prime minister – he or she is not going to say no if Trudeau decides to call an election, because there are no grounds for them to do so. The only time they have any kind of discretion around this is if the incumbent demands another election right after he or she ostensibly lost one, and if there is a viable alternative, the GG has every right to ask the incumbent to see if they can maintain confidence, and if not, another party can be invited to form government. There is this perception that the vice-regal has a truckload of discretion in these matters, and they simply don’t. More to the point, having the opposition sign-off on a new GG would then allow Trudeau to launder the prerogative and accountability for the decision to advise the Queen on that person, which we do not want. That’s not how Responsible Government works. Yes, there is merit to restoring the vice-regal appointments committee (but it’s too late for Payette’s replacement, because that process should have started months ago), but even then, the PM still has the final say from the names put to him on the short-list, as well he should. O’Toole is trying to sow confusion, and is giving further disinformation as to how our system works, which is very bad because it’s that kind of thing that undermines democratic norms. Knock it off!
Good reads:
- We have reached 20,000 COVID deaths in Canada, while Dr. Theresa Tam is calling on provinces to maintain restrictions as new variants are now circulating.
- Novavax has submitted their vaccine to Health Canada for approval.
- The pandemic has slowed the process of refugee sponsorships to a crawl, which is leaving people in vulnerable situations for longer with no clue as to their wait.
- Here’s a look at the state of regulating big tech and web giants in Canada, as Facebook makes warning noises about Australian-style rules on paying for news.
- While most civil servants are working from home these days, the lights remain on in many government buildings for a myriad of reasons.
- The NDP want you to know that they have finally repaid their campaign debts.
- Kevin Carmichael sounds the alarm that our economy has become too dependent on real estate, which is not productive and won’t lead to future growth.
- Heather Scoffield reminds us that Canada needs to step up its game on attracting immigrants now that Trump is no longer the threat he was.
- Susan Delacourt talks to Justin Trudeau about his relationship with Joe Biden, as well as what he’s learned about himself in the pandemic.
Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.
Wrecking-ball cons claim to be all about “God and country” but have no respect for norms or institutions, especially not when it doesn’t benefit them and/or they feel they can use them as a bad-faith cudgel against liberals. O’Toole is parroting the Mitch McConnell line of Obama can’t appoint Supreme Court justices in an election year, and then went ahead and fast-tracked the Stepford kook he handpicked for Trump. I note that Joe Clark has been floated in the media as a possible contender. Harper probably saw that and salivated out of an irresistible desire for O’Toole to grant him the keys to the kingdom. Not out of the realm of possibility, which makes it yet another reason to keep the actual would-be dictators away from the levers of power!