Roundup: Look at all the chimeric ministers

With the usual bit of pomp and circumstance, the Cabinet has been shuffled in advance of Parliament being summoned. It is bigger by two bodies, there are seven new faces, a few new portfolios – and baffling ones at that – a few being folded back into their original ministries, and yes, gender parity was maintained throughout. The Cabinet committees are also getting a shuffle, which gives you a glimpse at what they see the focus will be, and spoiler alert, it’s very domestic and inward-looking – not much of a surprise in a hung parliament where there are few plaudits or seats to be won on foreign affairs files. It’s also no surprise that it’s Quebec and Ontario-heavy, and largely representing urban ridings, because that’s where the Liberals won their seats.

And thus, the biggest headline is of course that Chrystia Freeland has been moved from foreign affairs to intergovernmental affairs, but with the added heft of being named deputy prime minister – the first time this title has been employed since Paul Martin, and Freeland assures us that it’s going to come with some heft and not just be ceremonial. She’s also retaining the Canada-US file, so that there remains continuity and a steady hand on the tiller as the New NAFTA completes the ratification process. It also would seem to indicate that it gives her the ability to keep a number of fingers in a number of pies, but we’ll have to wait for her mandate letter to see what specifics it outlines, though the expectations that she will have to manage national unity in this somewhat fractious period is a tall order. Jonathan Wilkinson moving to environment has been matched with the expected talk about his upbringing and education in Saskatchewan, so as to show that he understands the prairies as he takes on the environment portfolio. Jim Carr is out of Cabinet officially, but he will remain on a Cabinet committee and be the prime minister’s “special representative” to the prairie provinces, which is supposed to be a less taxing role as he deals with cancer treatments (though I don’t see how that couldn’t be a recipe for high blood pressure, but maybe that’s just me). Two other ministers were demoted – Kirsty Duncan, who will become deputy House Leader, and Ginette Petitpas Taylor, who will become the deputy Whip – though it should be noted that both House Leader and Whip are of added importance in a hung parliament.

The opposition reaction was not unexpected, though I have to say the Conservatives’ talking point was far pissier than I would have guessed – none of the usual “we look forward to working together, but we’ll keep our eyes on you,” kind of thing – no, this was bitter, and spiteful in its tone and language. Even Jason Kenney was classier in his response (but we all know that lasts about five minutes). That’ll make for a fun next few years if they keep this up.

As for some of my own observations, I was struck by the need to name a new Quebec lieutenant, given that Trudeau used to say that they had a Quebec general (meaning him), so no need, and lo, did the Conservatives had meltdowns over it. Likewise, there was thought under the previous parliament that they would eliminate all of those regional development ministers and put them all under Navdeep Bains (whose ministry has rebranded again from Industry, to Innovation, Science and Economic Development, and is now Innovation, Science, and Industry), which kept a lot of the kinds of nepotism that was rampant in those regional development agencies at bay. Now Trudeau has hived off the economic development portfolio into its own ministry, to be headed by Mélanie Joly, but she’ll have six parliamentary secretaries – one for each development agency region, which feels like the whole attempt to break those bonds is backsliding. Science as a standalone portfolio was folded back into Bains’ domain, but the very specific project that Kirsty Duncan was tasked with when she was given the portfolio four years ago was completed, so it made a certain amount of sense. Democratic Institutions is gone, folded back into Privy Council Office and any of its functions Dominic LeBlanc will fulfill in his role as President of the Queen’s Privy Council (which is a role that is traditionally secondary to another portfolio). Trudeau continued to keep his Leader of the Government in the Senate out of Cabinet, which is a mistake, but why listen to me? (I’m also hearing rumours that Senator Peter Harder is on his way out of the job, so stay tuned). The fact that David Lametti got a new oath as minister of justice and Attorney General to reflect the recommendations of the McLellan Report was noteworthy. But overall, my biggest observation is that Trudeau is doubling down on the kinds of chimeric ministries that tend to straddle departments, which makes for difficult accountability and confusing lines of authority on files. The most egregious of the new portfolios was the “Minister of Middle Class™ Prosperity,” which is a fairly bullshit title to attach to the fact that she’s also the Associate Minister of Finance, which should have been significant in the fact that it’s the closest we’ve been to a woman finance minister at the federal level, but dressing it up in this performative hand-waving about the Middle Class™ (which is not about an actual class but about feelings) is all the kinds of nonsense that keeps this government unable to communicate its way out of a wet paper bag, and it’s just so infuriating.

https://twitter.com/sproudfoot/status/1197239923100856321

In hot takes, Chantal Hébert sees the move of Freeland as the defining one of this shuffle, and notes that it could either be just what they need, or it could be a kamikaze mission for Freeland. Susan Delacourt sees the composition of the new Cabinet as one that corrects past mistakes and of taking on lessons learned. Robert Hiltz points to the two polarities of this Cabinet – the farce of the Minister of Middle Class™ Prosperity, and the menace of putting Bill Blair in charge of public safety. Paul Wells makes the trenchant observation that carving up ministries across several ministers has the effect of creating multiple redundancies that will make more central control necessary – and I think he’s right about that. (Also, for fun, Maclean’s timed the hugs Trudeau gave his ministers, which didn’t compare to some from 2015).

https://twitter.com/StephanieCarvin/status/1197245638548869120

Good reads:

  • The government has imposed more reporting requirements on CSIS so that they disclose more of their “high-risk” operations to their minister.
  • Here is a look at how the New NAFTA ratification is now a political football in Washington DC amidst impeachment hearings.
  • The Rideau Hall Foundation (which is not associated with the GG) has pulled out of a charity Prince Andrew’s flagship project, prior to his stepping down from his duties.
  • Two Conservative insiders penned an op-ed calling on the party to move forward on LGBT issues, or continue to be satisfied with second place.
  • In Alberta, the government dropped the requirement to report on class sizes, because statistics may prove inconvenient.
  • The head of the board that reviews Not Criminal Responsible cases in Alberta resigned because of the way she has been ignored by the justice minister.
  • Kady O’Malley’s Process Nerd column details how the committees are going to get very interesting in the context of a hung parliament.
  • Heather Scoffield objects to the pre-election spending announcements by the Liberals (apparently oblivious to how fixed election dates encourage this).
  • Kevin Carmichael parses the speech by the Bank of Canada’s senior deputy governor, Carolyn Wilkins, and the market reaction, and the guidance it provided.
  • Colby Cosh offers his own sound condemnation of Rachel Notley’s attempt to engage the lieutenant governor to deny royal assent to an odious bill.
  • My column delves into the last round of musical chairs in the Senate, and some of the less obvious things that happened as part of it.

Odds and ends:

Want more Routine Proceedings? Become a patron and get exclusive new content.

3 thoughts on “Roundup: Look at all the chimeric ministers

  1. A clearly defined pattern from the nasty party:

    “the Conservatives’ talking point was far pissier than I would have guessed – none of the usual ‘we look forward to working together, but we’ll keep our eyes on you,’ kind of thing – no, this was bitter, and spiteful in its tone and language.”

    That’s not all they’re going to be bitter and spiteful about.

    “the committees are going to get very interesting in the context of a hung parliament.”

    Expect at least two years of Impeachment Fever™ moving north and partisan screeching about the SNC Benghazi!!! affair. (With the NDP playing along as foot soldiers.)

    “Two Conservative insiders penned an op-ed calling on the party to move forward on LGBT issues, or continue to be satisfied with second place.”

    Why would the GOP-CPC bother evolving on policy when they can just beat the Crooked Hillary, Crooked Biden, Crooked Justin dead horse into glue?

    “That’ll make for a fun next few years if they keep this up.” And of course, they will.

  2. ” The most egregious of the new portfolios was the “Minister of Middle Class™ Prosperity,” “.

    We’re not far removed from the Ministry of Silly Walks, are we?

Comments are closed.