All of the drama yesterday was the news that Maxime Bernier decided to spike his own planned book after his chapter blaming his loss on “fake Conservatives” supporting Andrew Scheer, particularly when the defenders of Supply Management took out memberships to stop Bernier. When he did release a statement late in the day, Bernier basically blamed the media for writing about the controversial stuff, which is kind of ridiculous given that he should have known that questioning the legitimacy of Scheer’s win, and putting in print that he planned to renege on his promise to shut up about Supply Management was going to be trouble no matter what else was in the book. (No word on whether he spent his advance already, as he now will have to refund it).
A couple of observations first: Of course the leadership contest was lousy with “fake Conservatives.” That’s what our leadership contests have become in Canada, given that it’s about trying to get as many new members as possible to bestow enough “democratic legitimacy” on a would-be leader so that they can turn the party into their own personal cult. Until we change the system and restore it to caucus selection, this will only get increasingly worse as time goes on. Part of his analysis that his problem was just defenders of Supply Management as the problem ignores the fact that there were a hell of a lot more people taking out party memberships in order to stop Kellie Leitch (and by extension, Brad Trost and Pierre Lemieux, but mostly Leitch). They didn’t deliver the contest for Michael Chong, and it’s hard to say how many of those ballots wound up going toward Scheer instead of Bernier. Also, Scheer knew that Bernier was going to be mavericky when he made him a critic on an economic portfolio, so he can’t be surprised that this kind of eruption was going to happen. It’s who Bernier is, and it’s kind of surprising that it took this long for Bernier to realize that maybe it’s not a good thing for the image the party is trying to put forward. (On a side note, every time a leader insists that they’ve never been more united, I brace for a defection, because I’ve heard those insistences too many times).
Paul Wells wrote a very good piece about Bernier and the value of loyalty in politics, which most journalists don’t really grasp, which explains why politicians do the things they do, and compromise in the way that they do. It’s one of the things I do think about and probably don’t wrap my head around enough, but it goes back to the way in which people continue to blame the parties for “making” MPs do things they wouldn’t ordinarily do, right up to compromising their beliefs and whatnot. MPs have the choice to do whatever – parties don’t make them, MPs do these things of their own volition. Senators too, for that matter – even when it goes against their best interest, or the normal operations of that chamber. They do it out of loyalty to the leader or the party, take your pick, and while we could have a debate about the effect of method of selection on that loyalty, we need to think more about that lens when we’re having these discussions.
Good reads:
- In London, Justin Trudeau met with the Queen, as well as Thresa May, New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Arden, as well as Five Eyes partners on a security briefing.
- Chrystia Freeland is headed back to Washington for some crucial decisions on NAFTA talks.
- While Kinder Morgan’s CEO says the political battles may mean the pipeline remains untenable, BC says that they will file their court reference within days.
- The Commons health committee released their study on universal pharmacare, which the health minister says will be the basis of their consultations.
- In advance of the Liberal convention, the health minister has already rejected the policy resolution to adopt a Portugal-style drug decriminalization scheme.
- Speaking of the convention, Kent Hehr says he will attend, and attend one of the sexual harassment workshops being offered there.
- UN climate data shows our GHG emission are decreasing – but not nearly fast enough to meet our Paris targets.
- A report from the former Inspector General of CSIS was uncovered, showing problems with the way the agency conducts interviews with detainees abroad.
- The agency that was supposed to create guidelines for service dogs for veterans with PTSD has pulled out of the project unexpectedly.
- Two Catholic Bishops took to the Hill to defend the Pope’s refusal to apologise for residential schools. One Conservative MP blocked a motion to demand an apology.
- The RCMP are set for their union certification vote.
- Pierre Poilievre continues to snipe about the guaranteed minimum income report, and cites Ontario’s model as a bad starting point because of costs.
- Andrew Coyne looks at the PBO report on guaranteed minimum income, and wonders if three points on the GST is a good deal for eliminating poverty.
- Chantal Hébert reads the polls and wonders if the pipeline debate is really resonating with Canadians, and whether it will affect Trudeau in the next election.
Odds and ends:
Liberal MP Neil Ellis was taken to hospital for an undisclosed condition.
Earlier today PM Justin Trudeau had an audience with the Queen at Buckingham Palace.
The PM is in London for a two-day meeting of Commonwealth heads of government. pic.twitter.com/dV9FgJECJN— CPAC (@CPAC_TV) April 18, 2018
Queen of Canada, long may she reign. pic.twitter.com/t3udUonnru
— Adam Scotti 🇨🇦📷 (@AdamScotti) April 18, 2018
What are the strengths and challenges for the @liberal_party on the road to #election2019? Here's what political writer @journo_dale had to say.
Watch every second, every session of the 2018 National Liberal Convention live on CPAC and https://t.co/7GISRfmyag #cdnpoli #Lib2018 pic.twitter.com/RURTCfW0H4
— CPAC (@CPAC_TV) April 18, 2018
Help Routine Proceedings expand. Support my Patreon.