Sometimes you see a terrible column, and sometimes there’s such a piece of hot garbage that you need to don a hazmat suit just to approach it and get hosed off afterward like you just came out of a leaking nuclear reactor. The Toronto Sun’s Christina Blizzard delivered one of those yesterday.
In which Christina Blizzard calls for an end to responsible government in Ontario. https://t.co/qgtszjQYHL
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
.@davidreevely pic.twitter.com/ntSE67hSdw
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) September 14, 2016
That’s right – this columnist thinks that the lieutenant governor should threaten Kathleen Wynne to shape up or she’ll dismiss her, because 167 years of Responsible Government was just a failed experiment. One lesbian first minister in this province and we’ve decided that it was too much – time to hand power back to the queen and be done with it.
The last LG to do it was then himself dismissed by the feds, according to Blizzard's authority.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
(She doesn't mention that part.)
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
Blizzard calls on Dowdeswell to do this explicitly because the voters are idiots and can't be trusted.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
You see! Voters can’t be trusted! Obviously we’d be better off under absolute monarchy again because they won’t let such terrible governments to let themselves get elected and then implement the agendas that they were elected on. It’s like the fanboys in the First Order who remember the good old days of the Galactic Empire and preferred it to the messy democracy of the New Republic.
Maybe you remember the last time a viceroy asserted himself. Lord Byng denied Mackenzie King a dissolution.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
When the following minority government collapsed instantly, Mackenzie King ran on the issue and was resoundingly re-elected.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
And that was pretty much the end of viceroys thinking they had power in situations like this. Viz Michaelle Jean and prorogation.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
The LG does what the premier tells her to because that's how our democracy works.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
It’s called confidence. Whichever leader in the legislature or Parliament that can command the confidence of the chamber gets to advise the LG/GG/queen on how to exercise the powers of state. Not a difficult concept.
The system has its problems. But one in which LGs dismiss premiers is so much worse.
— David Reevely (@davidreevely) September 14, 2016
It is utterly galling that a columnist can be so utterly ignorant of basic civics that this is the kind of utter bilge that they spew onto newsprint. We do have a problem with basic civic literacy in this country, and when you have columnists like this spreading complete nonsense out of some sense of partisanship, it gives a warped impression to people who read this and makes them believe that it’s actually normal and expected that the GG or the LG can boss around a government that you don’t like. No. Absolutely not.
https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/775866168863260672
https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/775866395414372352
https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/775866681998635008
That can't be right. I keep hearing that the Crown can and must dismiss the PM if I don't like him/her.
— Stephen Gordon (@stephenfgordon) September 14, 2016
https://twitter.com/pmlagasse/status/775868249749807108
So let me reiterate that Blizzard’s column is utter hot garbage. If the Sun had any shame, they’d pull it and apologise profusely for putting it out there, and Blizzard would be sent to a remedial civics course, but I doubt that’s going to happen because she’s just passionate about how bad Wynne is, or some bullshit excuse like that. So in the meantime, I’ll just leave this here:
As a reminder to two-bit columnists who spout nonsense like Blizzard, I have a book coming out about our system: https://t.co/RTe6yZPutn
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) September 14, 2016
Good reads:
- Nothing to see here, say the NDP as they “unanimously” support Mulcair (without a vote) and the people agitating against him go to ground.
- Now that Justice Cromwell has officially retired, he talks about his misgivings over the Nadon decision, and his plans to continue to fight for access to justice.
- Maclean’s looks at the hearing into the conduct of Justice Robin Camp and the culture of judges policing themselves in Canada.
- Chrystia Freeland is off to Europe to try and push for CETA ratification.
- Kevin Page says the government needs better tracking data on infrastructure spending. The PBO says he doesn’t enough data. Government says meh.
- The electoral reform committee wants money for modelling different system outcomes, but unless party breakups are considered it’ll be for naught.
- Here’s a look at how building trust with the locals enabled searchers to find HMS Terror, which Parks Canada wasn’t able to do.
- Here’s a look at the state of the law when it comes to polyamorous relationships (which is not polygamy).
- NDP MP Niki Ashton is touring the country to talk to people about precarious employment.
- Kellie Leitch is dismissing her critics as “elites,” which is precious considering she’s a surgeon and former cabinet minister.
- Peter MacKay cautioned his fellow Conservatives not to take the “offensive” route to leadership, while Tony Clement bashed Christine Lagarde.
- Robyn Urback reminds us why Tony Clement’s national security policy proposals are completely bananas.
- Andrew Coyne muses about the fading relevance of Canada Post’s monopoly and some of their sacred cows like universal rates.
Odds and ends:
The National Post went digging into the Diefenbaker photo archives, and it’s a pretty interesting retrospective.
It wasn't a Mulcair mutiny but I'm reliably told more than a dozen NDP MPs privately advocated change. Didn't press for a leadership vote.
— Don Martin (@DonMartinCTV) September 14, 2016
So Mulcair resurrects “socialism” as a party value after getting it out of the party constitution? Interesting. #PnPCBC
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) September 14, 2016
https://twitter.com/journo_dale/status/776169341213667328
If #ERRE’s proposed modelling of different system outcomes focuses only on existing parties, it will be for naught. https://t.co/otOLfIaMH9
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) September 15, 2016
The break-up of big tent brokerage parties is a reality that #ERRE should contemplate and be part of their discussions.
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) September 15, 2016
Typo – 1st para: Blizzard writes??? for the Sun, not The Star.
Fixed. Thanks for the catch!
Speaking of “hot garbage”, I don’t believe you offered a link or comments about an Andrew Coyne column the other day supporting mandatory voting (http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/andrew-coyne-how-do-we-know-mandatory-voting-makes-sense-look-at-the-2016-census).
Because I missed it, apparently. Thanks for passing it along.
Worth noting that the last major assertion of the right to dismiss by an LG was in 1991, not all that long ago (LG Lam in BC). (http://www.revparl.ca/english/issue.asp?param=74&art=163)
Interesting – thanks! I will note that the facts in that case are wholly unlike what Blizzard is complaining about in Ontario, however, which is part of why her column is such hot garbage.