A little less than a year after the last election, Stephen Harper announced yesterday that he was finally resigning his seat as an MP, and will be off to face future challenges under the banner of his own private consultation firm, Harper and Associates. Apparently he is looking forward to “building something new” and will have an international focus in his new endeavours, which I find a bit curious considering that this was someone who had never even left the country until he became Leader of the Opposition, and whose foreign policy during his time in government was a tad, well, ham-fisted. Oh, and he’ll be joining a speaker’s bureau and tour the world to give speeches, which again is against the grain of his time in office when he was known for not only speaking as little as possible, but also of scrubbing any bits of humanity from his speeches in order to make them as dull and forgettable as possible with no hint of personality in them. We’ll see if he plans to continue this in his new life. Meanwhile, here are some reactions from some of his former cabinet ministers, other notable Canadians, and five ways that Harper changed politics in Canada. Susan Delacourt writes about Harper’s legacy of being a lone wolf and keeping everyone at a distance.
If we’re going to talk legacy, then his longevity is one of the biggest points, but we’ll see how lasting any of his accomplishments are. His ability to reunite the Conservative party, such as it was (because let’s face it, this was not the Progressive Conservative party of John A. Macdonald, John Diefenbaker, Joe Clark or Kim Campbell) was an accomplishment, but we’ll see if it holds under new leadership or if we have a new voting system. After all, a proportional representation system would see the parts of the conservative coalition break-off out of the big tent into smaller factions that would see advantage in gaining outsized power from a new system, and you can bet that the social conservative elements would not have the patience to stick with a party that has ignored them if they can gain seats and leverage in another way. The vast majority of his policy agenda is well on the way to being rolled back under the new government, with the exception of the fiscal stranglehold that Harper put on the nation’s finances with his decision to cut the GST by two points. That is the only real policy area that the new government has shown no appetite to roll back, but if deficits persist, then raising the GST may be something they would consider (though the fact that some of the provinces have moved into that tax room – which was Harper’s plan all along, in order to see the federal government retreat further from their affairs). He has a legacy of some Supreme Court of Canada judgments that have put a lot of roadblocks on attempts to change the constitution by backdoor or “unofficial” means, so take that for what you will. But his other plan of obliterating the Liberals and turning Canada into a two-party state of Conservatives versus NDP – as he so nearly succeeded in doing in 2011 – has unravelled spectacularly, and saw not only the resurgence of the Liberal party, but a deep wounding of the NDP in the process. So what does this all add up to? I guess we’ll have to wait to see the history books, but it is a legacy that seems to have a shrinking quality less than a year after his time in office ended.
Good reads:
- The government is signalling that they will commit 600 troops and $450 million for new UN peace operations, but won’t say where they are planning to send them.
- In case you wondered why they created a cabinet committee on litigation affairs, there are some 45,000 legal cases pending against the government.
- Nathan Cullen and Elizabeth May aren’t happy that the big election reform committee tour isn’t stopping at many smaller or First Nations communities.
- Here’s a look at how recent CRTC changes will negatively affect Canadian television productions.
- Tony Clement talks Atlantic Canada, bridge tolls, and his desire to defund the CBC.
- Paul Wells writes about the problems that the Liberals are having bonding with such a big caucus, and their warnings against complacency.
- Kady O’Malley maps out a possible course for how an electoral referendum might play out.
- Susan Delacourt profiles new Liberal MP Raj Grewal, whose path to politics started when he met Navdeep Bains on the basketball court.
Odds and ends:
A special mediator has been appointed to avoid a Canada Post strike.
Nevermind regional representation on #SCC is a flexible convention, while regional voice in Senate is spelled out in constitutional text.
— Aniz Alani (@AnizAlani) August 27, 2016
Or, for that matter, the indignant rhetoric of those who now see this as a “slap in the face” (@lraitt) or “spit in our eye” (@MacKayCPC)?
— Aniz Alani (@AnizAlani) August 27, 2016