As we heard late last week, the NDP’s democratic reform critic, Nathan Cullen, has been pushing his new idea of a “proportional” committee to better examine electoral reform options and come up with an idea that can be presented to Canadians. It’s a gimmick, of course, and it one has to be cognisant of Cullen’s agenda, which is of course a certain kind of proportional representation system that his party favours, just like Cullen’s other suggestion of “trying” an election with a new system and then asking voters for forgiveness by means of a referendum after the fact. It’s trying to game the system in a way he prefers, as Colby Cosh pointed out over the weekend, which should raise any number of red flags for those who take Cullen’s proposition seriously.
"One can view Cullen's proposal as reflecting a proportional system for allocating committee seats.” No, one can’t. https://t.co/Lr1BR2UrCy
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
Seriously, the Greens and the Bloc did not get one-twelfth of the 2015 vote BETWEEN them. Cullen gives them 2/12ths of the seats. Why?
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
“We can’t even use literal PR to pick the committee to bring in PR” is as strong a condemnation as PR could get, & it’s not from an opponent
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
Troublingly, it seems possible that PR advocates may not even know how to reckon proportions.
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
Why would we consider them together at all? Oh, right, because it’s advantageous for what Nathan Cullen wants. https://t.co/dR9EBr3sen
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
But, hey, we can’t expect the people who’ve been screaming about PR for years to know stuff like that. @BenBrisebois @EmmMacfarlane
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
This is actually an operating example of how politicians game the tricky details of an electoral reform. Before your very eyes!
— Colby Cosh (@colbycosh) February 6, 2016
Good reads:
- There is talk that the federal government is unwilling to help Bombardier unless it makes some changes to its governance.
- It looks like the new government is going to carry on with protecting CSIS sources from a lawsuit that led to people being tortured abroad.
- The Privacy Commissioner wants more information from the Government Operations Centre, which tracks protests that happen in this city.
- A new StatsCan computer system for census data is behind and over budget, thanks in large part to Shared Services Canada. Look surprised, everyone!
- Rona Ambrose was in Atlantic Canada to meet with her provincial counterparts to figure out how they can work together to rebuild.
- John McCallum assures us that the refugee resettlement is still going according to plan.
- Lawyers representing thousands of Roma refugee claimants were found guilty of misconduct and disbarred – but those Roma who were deported are in the lurch.
- The Ukrainian Ambassador doesn’t buy the Conservative fear mongering that renewed diplomatic relations with Russia means we’re abandoning Ukraine.
Odds and ends:
Here’s an “exit interview” with our outgoing ambassador in Washington, Gary Doer.
The plan for the next phase of the ISIS mission in Iraq and Syria will be unveiled today.
Dear #cdnpoli journalists: *This* is what gerrymandering refers to. https://t.co/feJfvGtGsU
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) February 7, 2016