Roundup: Find a new narrative for Mulcair

Michael Den Tandt writes that Thomas Mulcair is the most effective parliamentarian that we have today – which makes me weep a lot, mostly because it simply isn’t true. Den Tandt focuses on the three main party leaders, and tries to rate them on performance versus the attention that they get, and his thesis is that Mulcair may be the most effective but gets least attention for all manner of reasons. But in his construction of said premise, he gets a few things wrong. For one, he claims that Mulcair ditched his speaking notes, which is absolutely not true. What Mulcair did was ditch the mini-lectern on his desk, but not until the heyday of Duffy questions, which really was Mulcair’s moment. It was his “prosecutor-in-chief” moment, which lasted for about two days, and then petered out, and he has yet to re-create the moment or the energy since. He still has his notes – they’re just on his desk, and he still reads from them, and it’s evident in both the tone and substance of his questions – particularly as he rarely asks direct follow-ups, and may not ask a follow-up until 20 minutes later in QP, or not at all until the next day. The problem remains that much of the commentariat remains fixated on this vision of Mulcair as “prosecutor-in-chief” and “best performer in the House” even though it was a two-day experience that has not been repeated since. Of course, they don’t attend QP and one isn’t sure how often they watch the forced perspectives on CPAC, so they can stick with this image and not have it shaken by daily exposure to what Mulcair is really like as a performer. And there are far better parliamentarians as a whole – those who show up for debates, fully researched and able to speak off-the-cuff, to ask or take questions, and to do more than simply read speeches into the record. They’re few and far between, but they do exist. Mulcair is not one of those MPs – not by a long shot. But somewhere along the way, those couple of days during the Duffy heyday has given pundits a narrative that they refuse to be shaken from. And it makes me sad that after watching Bob Rae wipe the floor with his opponents during QP for nearly two years, for whom Mulcair was a non-entity in comparison day in and day out, that his far superior performance is so easily forgotten.

Good reads:

  • The Liberals are shaking up the narrative that they’re bad for the military by running a number of candidates with fairly substantial military experience.
  • Laura Payton previews all of the political court cases we can look forward to in 2015.
  • The government is spending another $5 million on Canada 150 ads, when it’s two years away and they don’t appear to have any kind of plan to go with said ads.
  • Alison Loat writes why she doesn’t believe in mandatory voting.

Odds and ends:

Justin Trudeau is headed on a “personal not political” tour of the Arctic this week, and he’s making a point of going in winter, unlike the PM.

https://twitter.com/mikepmoffatt/status/551480700483170304

https://twitter.com/mikepmoffatt/status/551481037810073602

https://twitter.com/mikepmoffatt/status/551481256752709632